As you know, nearly all individuals who access the Internet, pay for the privilege. Since this is the case, and the fact is Not contested, it is disturbing to hear some of the 'proposals' from the Big Telcos. Access should be uninhibited. If any consumer has a Home PC, or Home Network, with hardware capable of and configured to afford the maximum Through Put which their ISP is capable of offering, then they should be ...more »
Transparency/Disclosure of Network Management Practices
Though it may be necessary for ISP's to throttle network traffic, the way in which they do so should be transparent. The rules of the road should be free and public, and if our bandwidth is being restricted we should be able to find out why, easily and painlessly.
Internet Service Providers should be required to release specifications for their network management process. These specifications should be detailed enough that a 3rd party could make a model of the process. Companies that argue producing the specifications would be to costly are lying. The specifications should already exist for the programmers to use. I won't pretend to know how to manage network traffic, but I do ...more »
I am reading the NPRM published here: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.pdf It is supposed to be 200 pages but I only see 107. I think before we decide to pass legislation on this we should understand exactly what is being proposed. Almost all the comments on here I have seen amount to "open internet is good, I vote yes" but nobody seems to be looking at the actual specific items and deciding ...more »
By Rick Nauert PhD Senior News Editor Reviewed by John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on July 3, 2006 Are some corporate CEO’s, doctors, lawyers, politicians and scientists psychopaths? The answer could be “yes” if you use a definition which labels individuals who are often intelligent and highly charismatic, but display a chronic inability to feel guilt, remorse or anxiety about any of their actions. Tack on the use of violence ...more »
FCC moves to gain more authority over broadband service
Comcast just won a court decision against the FCC in a net neutrality case. I think that an ISP does have a right to regulate bandwidth and that the customer has a right to choose a different ISP. Read more on this decision and the FCC response here.
Contracts should not be misleading by stating a data-plan or broadband service is 'unlimited' when really the contract provider has some secret idea of when it is OK to start limiting your service, or what services they don't want to work so well due to their personal conflicts of interest. If the internet service is limited, then state so and price accordingly. Right now they are boasting high speeds, then throttling ...more »
The FCC should monitor all matriculating students on the web which websites they visit to help better understand the student body as a whole. The parents of each family should be allowed unlimited privelage on a nuetral web to let their children visit any site whatever, as long as the parent gives permission. With the given information this can be shared with the shcool boards without any objections whatever, unless a ...more »
Like all radio was used for communication it is conventional and it is overused now for entertainment. Asthetic creation is controllable in Bonsaie Trees we bend their branches and shape them beautifully, it clip birds wings and we have a pet, it cuts out the bark of dogs and we have quite neighboorhoods. OK, but now about Radio waves and the FCC our Radio waves are going into space forever and into our eyes, ears, and ...more »
The use of the software tool known as DOCSIS needs to be banned. This was partly at the heart of the Comcast issue of 2008, outed in 2007 when it was discovered that Comcast was slowing down a customer's downloading of legal Bittorrent files, such as from major video houses, online. Comcast was sending out fake 'download failed' error messages, and the user being none the wiser initially, closed the download. But he ...more »