Activity Stream [+]
Ideas Contributed [ 4 ] [+]
The freedom of speech has absolutely no relevance to "open internet" discussions. Freedom of speech comes with a requirement that the "free speaker" does not violate another's fundamental rights. Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater or such uses of speech are not protected. Where is the corresponding responsibility for "open Internet". Where they are at now is completely nonexistent. SEC III ¶ (51) is the best definition ...more »
Children, the SEC lawyers and the rest of the public are preparing to be terribly upset when the FCC is ordered to regulate communications by wire as has been their missions since before it was called Internet. It was a good trillion dollar porn muscle but 05151 will make the FCC finally read page eight paragraph 51.
(51) WIRE COMMUNICATION.--The term ''wire communication'' or ''communication by wire'' means the transmission of writing, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds of all kinds by aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the points of origin and reception of such transmission, including all instrumentalities, facilities, apparatus, and services (among other things, the receipt, forwarding, and delivery of communications) ...more »
This will become obvious to even Google Inc by the time my lawsuit completes. Copy-right has never had anything to do with a right. It has always been simply a rite whereby the prices of publicly distributing ideas was fixed. A judge, Benjamin Huntington, appointed to Congress conspired with an early textbook publisher, Noah Webster, and plagiarized the 1710 Statute of Anne that had recently established King George's ...more »